Service

CMS Comparison: Wordpress vs. Statamic vs. Storyblok

Martin Welte

Senior Developer

There are many CMS to choose from. They all have their pros and cons, but which one is right for you? To help you decide, we have compared the three main ones.

Wordpress: Widely used = good?

Wordpress is the most widely used CMS out there - which makes it easy for businesses to find developers. Many marketers who will be using it primarily are therefore already familiar with it. The plugin ecosystem is huge and there is a solution for almost every use case. It is also easy for developers to work with the framework. This makes it the perfect solution for small businesses that need a lot of different features, but don't have the money to develop everything individually.

The positive aspects are also the biggest drawbacks of Wordpress. Sites built with Wordpress tend to be unstable. Reasons for this include plugin support, security issues, feature overload and database overload. The widespread use of Wordpress also makes it an easy target for hackers. That's why Wordpress sites require a lot more maintenance than other CMS systems.

Wordpress: Pros & Cons

👍That's what we like about Wordpress:

  • Good documentation.

  • Huge community. Support for emerging issues is easy to find

  • Large plugin repository for add-ons.

  • Low requirements

  • Backwards compatibility (not always a good thing).

  • Free of charge

👍We find this less good:

  • Testability in a Wordpress context is virtually impossible

  • Not suitable for large applications

  • Wordpress core too slow for some applications

  • An attractive target for automated attacks

  • Too insecure for enterprises with higher security standards

  • Difficult to deploy automatically

  • No out-of-the-box package management

Statamic: New and simple?

Statamic is perfect as a small CMS system. It integrates multilingual support / asset management / user management / customisation right out of the box. Its biggest selling point is its integration with a Laravel application. There is no need for another solution to be integrated into the Laravel application. Everything that is available in the Laravel application can also be used in Statamic.

Statamic: Pros & Cons

👍 That's what we like about Statamic:

  • Good documentation

  • Laravel as core

  • Ideal to have an application with a part of CMS functionality

  • Management of packages

  • Automatic deployment

  • Not as monolithic as other CMS systems. I.e. practically any part can be replaced

  • Easy testability

  • Easy to use / flat learning curve

  • Designed with security in mind from the start

👎 We find this less good:

  • Not free (core requires a license, as do most plugins).

  • New player

  • Custom templating language (but can't be omitted).

  • Small plugins repository as of now

Storyblok: Less is more?

Storyblok is a data first headless CMS system. It is the perfect solution when CMS functionality is the main component of a project. Its API approach means that it is also implementation independent - the same data can be used on different platforms (e.g.: web, apps, internal tools).

However, since Storyblok's only role is to host the CMS data, it lacks basic functionality for most websites. Storyblok cannot send emails, process data inputs, or apply business logic. Customization capabilities are severely limited. The platform's functionality can only be extended to a very limited extent. It was also not designed for use by larger teams.

Storyblok: Pros & Cons

👍Here's what we like about Storyblok:

  • Application independent (only the data is stored, where it is used is up to you, e.g. app, website, intranet).

  • Ease of use

  • Speed of implementation

  • CDN integrated with Storyblok

  • Intuitive image service

  • Only front-end skills required to implement a website

  • Provides a great visual editing experience

👎 We find this less good:

  • Small community (still)

  • Licence required

  • Difficult to use in a team

  • No way to handle application logic (e.g. sessions, automated jobs, emails, queries, etc.)

  • Data storage and retrieval only possible from one source

  • Fragmented system where each part works independently

  • Cannot yet handle large amounts of data efficiently

  • Limitations due to features supported by the Storyblok platform

Our conclusion?

None of the existing CMS systems is perfect. In the specific case, you should weigh up exactly which advantages you don't want to miss and which disadvantages you can put up with. In the end, choosing the right CMS system is never easy, but hopefully, with our comparison a little clearer.

We will find the right CMS for you!